Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
31 - 40 of 11103 results
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, ECJD
Highlight: Vacancy retained at Fargo |
Cichos, et al. v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C., et al.
Highlight: Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., preserves our long-standing policy against piecemeal appeals. When this Court considers the merits in a case involving a N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, it does so because the resolution of the issue on appeal will always need to be resolved and is separate from the issue left to be adjudicated. |
Schmidt v. Hess Corp., et al.
Highlight: To prove negligence, a plaintiff must establish the existence of a duty, breach of that duty, and an injury proximately caused by the breach of duty. |
State v. Fuglesten
Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a conditional plea is reversed and remanded to allow for withdrawal of the guilty plea because law enforcement illegally entered the home without exigent circumstances. If a misdemeanant is fleeing law enforcement, then exigent circumstances are required to permit law enforcement to enter the misdemeanant's home. |
Rennie v. State
Highlight: A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.
Highlight: We will not consider an appeal in a multi-claim lawsuit where the district court order disposes of fewer than all the claims against all the parties unless the court has determined that a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) is appropriate. |
Berdahl v. Berdahl
Highlight: When this Court has made a legal pronouncement and remanded a case for further proceedings, the parties may not relitigate the issue and the district court is required to follow the terms of our decision. The district court has some discretion on the procedures used on remand. However, that discretion is not without bounds and must be exercised within the scope of our decision. Adverse or erroneous rulings do not, by themselves, demonstrate bias of a district court judge. |
Interest of H.J.J.N.
Highlight: Litigants in civil nonjury cases have a right to have their attorneys make a final argument. A court errs by entering judgment prior to the closing of the briefing period. |
Interest of S.S.C.
|
Interest of Y.R.
|